|  
 There are three main obstacles to making electric cars a viable alternative   to those powered by internal combustion engines: the weight, cost and range   of the batteries. Internal combustion engines have range limits based on the   size of their fuel tank, but it only takes a few minutes to dump 10-15   gallons of liquid fuel in the tank and be on your way. It takes hours to   recharge a battery. Fast charging systems are being developed, but they will   require new infrastructure for the high currents and voltages required. The   cost issue also works against range. You can reduce cost with a smaller   battery, but you know what happens then. A battery with more range is both   heavier and more expensive. How about a smaller swappable battery? That's one   of the possible alternatives that Tesla is considering for the Model S sedan.   This brings a whole different set of problems with it. Even smaller batteries   will weigh several hundred pounds, making them difficult to handle. There are   also safety issues with handling high voltage batteries. You also need a   distribution infrastructure for the batteries and automakers have to   standardize on common pack formats to make the whole idea viable. It's not   like popping into a drug store for a set of AAs for you camera. Tesla's bright   idea just goes to show that electric cars have a long way to go before they   can replace internal combustion engines completely.
 
 [Source: Inside Line]
 | 
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment